Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Sweden's Supercharged ETF

In a recession, boring is best...

We're in a world where soup isn't just food for sick people―Campbell's stock (NYSE:CPB) has soothed many aching portfolios as financial contagion spread.

And far from being mocked as chumps while the market roared forward, U.S. Treasury bond investors have had the last laugh as a decade of S&P gains deflated.

When it comes to international stocks, boring old Sweden has beaten emerging bulls ― like Brazil, most recently ― as this chart of the iShares Sweden ETF (NYSE:EWD) shows:

sweden etf chart

Even though some Swedish banks served as outposts of financial access to now-troubled eastern European economies like Latvia, EWD has withstood systemic shocks and beaten its Brazilian counterpart (NYSE:EWZ). With a combination of industrial strength and top international management, Swedish companies merit a spot in your recession-fighting portfolio.

Stocking up on Stockholm Stocks

Sweden's top stocks aren't necessarily household names outside of northern Europe, at least not the way they're listed in iShares filings...

For example, shoppers may not recognize Stockholm-traded Hennes & Mauritz shares, but retail customers in nearly 30 countries can be found carrying bags with H&M emblazoned on the side! H&M is one of EWD's top holdings, and the ETF is the easiest way for U.S.-based investors to grab that company's shares.

Same goes for Sandvik AB, the world's top producer of metalworking tools that will be essential to any industrial recovery.

Sandvik is part of a heavy industrial allocation in the Swedish ETF (over 26%). Automaker Volvo is in there too, rounding out EWD's top ten holdings.

Nevertheless, many of Scandinavia's star stocks come from tech-heavy sectors like telecommunications.

Telecom equipment maker Ericsson (NASDAQ:ERIC) has made its mark from frosty northern Europe all the way to balmy Charlotte, North Carolina―the city's football stadium was known as Ericsson Stadium from 1996-2006. TeliaSonera, another Swedish telecoms company in the EWD fund, is becoming a prominent player in wireless and broadband internet solutions, but it still has a much lower profile than Ericsson.

Ericsson claims customers in 175 countries. That's just 5 short of the 180 countries the World Bank recognizes... not a bad reach from a base near the Arctic Circle!

Since Ericsson makes up 17% of EWD's total allocation, the ETF can inflate and deflate with the fortunes of that one company. Fortunately, Ericsson has given EWD a big boost in 2009. ERIC shares are up 15% through mid-March, compared to a drop of almost the same amount in the S&P and 10% swoon among Ericsson's Nasdaq tech peers. Ericsson's newest move is a pending $2 billion network outsourcing deal with Kansas City's Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S), which has been hemorrhaging customers on complaints of shoddy service.

That should save Sprint money and bring Ericsson new opportunities in the U.S. market.

High Taxes... Lower Risk?

Now, you shouldn't think Sweden is totally immune to global financial market mayhem or high volatility when it hits. But what we look for as international stock investors are those country-to-country differences that can help our investments survive.

Perhaps ironically, the main capitalist qualm when it comes to Sweden―its taxation system in which the top marginal rate is 65%―may now be a buttress against fiscal chaos.

Interest-rate loosening and budget shuffling are making national leaders and central bankers all over the world look like Benny Hill these days. It would be comical if it weren't all so frighteningly serious and urgent.

In Sweden, they're walking the tightrope between having a robust state welfare system that also takes in one of the world's highest proportions of asylum-seekers and the need to maintain growth potential and a healthy trade surplus. Investors are attracted to that balance, but only as long as it's there.

Balance is key for EWD, too.

With 31% of its holdings split between just two companies―Ericsson and H&M―EWD investors should watch those firms carefully. However, country ETFs have become the best option for quick international diversification and a way to spread your bets around not only companies but also economies.

So far this year, the market likes what it sees in Sweden. Keep EWD on your radar throughout 2009.

Fear and Lust on Wall Street

I've had this ongoing project of reading as much as I can about the 1930s and the Great Depression. I favor the first-person accounts, stuff written by people who were there ― like Damon Runyon.

Some of his early stories written in the 1930s reflect on the mood of the era. And even if you don't care for reading about the 1930s, you've got to love Runyon's way of capturing the voices of the times. For instance, "I put the old convincer on him by letting him peek down the snozzle of my John Roscoe." That's a pretty colorful way of saying you stuck a gun in somebody's face.

In these stories, there is also that undercurrent of bad times. You never forget it. People view anybody who looks well with suspicion. Prosperity of any kind is seen as unreal in some way. As Runyon writes:

"You cannot tell by the way a party looks or how he lives in this town if he has any scratch, because many a party who is around in automobiles, and wearing good clothes, and chucking quite a swell is nothing but the phonus bolonus and does not have any real scratch whatever."

There is also a macabre sense of humor. In one story, Runyon writes of being at a track in Miami. He's having a run of bad luck. It goes on awhile and gets worse. "I wonder if I will not be better off if I buy myself a rope and end it all on a palm tree in the park on Biscayne Boulevard," he writes. "But the only trouble with the idea is I do not have the price of a rope, and anyway I hear most of the palm trees in the park are already spoken for by guys who have the same notion."

It was an era with an undercurrent of playful meanness, too. For example, look at the nicknames of some of the baseball players in the 1930s. Author Bill James wrote about this years ago. "In the '30s, nicknames turned nasty," he wrote. If you had a big nose, you were "Schnozz" ― a nickname earned by Hall of Fame catcher Ernie Lombardi. If you were overweight, your nickname was "Blimp," as in Frankie "Blimp" Hayes. Or just "Fats," the nickname pinned on poor Bob Fothergill.

Some other nicknames used by journalists and forever affixed to players' names in the registers: "Stinky" "Boob" "Boom Boom" (for a pitcher with a 38-69 career record) and "Suitcase" for anybody who had trouble sticking with a team. Joe Medwick walked with his toes pointed out and got stuck with "Ducky." An outfield named Cuyler stuttered and they called him "Kiki" Cuyler. It was a brutal era.

I guess with bread lines, shantytowns and so many people out of work, no one cared about playing nice. In 1930s, you had to have thick skin.

Floyd Odlum: Making the Best of Bad Times

And more than just reading about the 1930s out of my own personal fascination with the period, there are also some practical benefits. There were people who made a lot of money in the Great Depression doing legal things. There is Floyd Odlum, for instance. He is sometimes described as the only guy to make a fortune in the Great Depression. (He wasn't.)

I've written to you about him before. The reason to revisit him briefly is that James Grant also wrote a little about him in a recent Grant's Interest Rate Observer. Grant calls him a "salvage artist par excellence." "None of us can know the future," Grant writes. "But like Odlum, we can make the best of a sometimes unappetizing present."

Grant also managed to scrounge up a pretty good anecdote on Odlum. In the summer of 1933, when all the world seemed to be in pieces, Odlum strolled into his office, looked at his glum partners and said: "I believe there's a better chance to make money now than ever before."

Odlum liked poking around in the smoking wreckage of the 1930s. Bad times create wonderful pricing. I suspect if Odlum were still alive, he'd find himself very busy. There is a lot to look at now.

Scared? Read This

A friend of mine recently wrote to me about how he was looking at Potash (POT: NYSE) with "fear and lust." It was a Hunter Thompson moment, and I knew exactly what he meant. Everything feels a little scary right now. At the same time, your rational brain gets excited about the great prices you see dancing on your screen.

"Fear and lust" sums up what it feels like investing in stocks market these days…

Every investor will have to overcome fear to buy anything today. I hate to try to call a bottom. But remember that even in bad times, the stock market can put up stunning rallies. Jeremy Grantham at GMO makes the point about sitting on cash too long:

"In June 1933, long before all the banks had failed or unemployment had peaked, the S&P rallied 105% in six months. Similarly, in 1974, it rallied 148% in five months in the U.K.! How would you have felt then with your large and beloved cash reserves? Finally, be aware that the market does not turn when it sees light at the end of the tunnel. It turns when all looks black, but just a subtle shade less black than the day before."

Backlash from the CVR Energy Sell

I'll end this week's note with a quick word on CVR Energy, which we parted with after a little more than a year with a terrible loss. I always get lots of e-mail after every sell, no matter whether it was up or down.

I'll reprint one of those e-mails…from my father:

"Your great analysis costs us $7,200 if we sell now. What happened to all that good stuff you wrote about it as far as the fertilizer plant and using its coke to run it? I thought (you thought) it was going to save it money, etc., on running the plant and make money on the fertilizer.

"Love, Dad"

Guess that will come out of my inheritance, assuming there is any. Well, a lot changed. Fertilizer prices tanked. Natural gas prices tanked, thereby making the company's use of pet coke less appealing with all this cheap gas around. And gasoline demand fell, as did prices, thereby hurting the refinery. On top of that, there is the seeming inability of the company to get it together and deliver a clean set of results.

I suppose CVR Energy will bounce back from these lows at some point. If you want to hold out for a better price, that seems reasonable. But I'd rather own other things in this environment. Sorry, Pop. We'll hit the next one!

 

Buy Project Better Place Stock

We may not be able to buy Project Better Place stock...

But a slew of publicly traded companies are playing an integral role in the world's most ambitious electric vehicle plan.

In fact, corporate campuses and employee homes at 19 of Israel's top companies will become testing grounds for advanced EV infrastructure.

And from these Middle Eastern hubs, multinational companies can spread and adapt their EV strategies around the world.

For instance, charging stations will be installed at the headquarters of Teva Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:TEVA), the world's top generic drug maker.

What's key here is that Teva also has offices in Mexico, Singapore, Brazil, Kenya, and dozens of other countries. And in all of those places, Teva's corporate strategy could mean spreading Better Place's EV infrastructure.

In 2009, Project Better Place is being propagated through the business world with the same sort of seeding strategy that Better Place CEO Shai Agassi first took to governments from Israel to Australia to Hawaii.

Among the other U.S.-listed partners for Better Place in Israel are Partner Communications (NASDAQ:PTNR), Orbotech Ltd. (NASDAQ:ORBK) and the local divisions of Nike and employment services giant Manpower (NYSE:MAN).

Car-Sharing and Electric Vehicles―Powerful Twin Trends

Corporate car sharing is an accelerating trend by itself, and EV plug-in stations make perfect sense as a twin technology. Pay-per-use services like Zipcar are becoming more and more ubiquitous, and traditional car rental companies like Hertz now moving into that market. Hertz spokeswoman Paula Rivera told the Boston Globe this week that car sharing is a "$1 billion market with potential to grow."

Shai Agassi put it this way:

"We are today seeing the certification that there is real market demand for electric cars that will use Better Place's grid. We expect demand to grow as Israeli companies join in the vision, as well as in other countries, which together represent a potential global market of 50 million cars. We see today the tip of the iceberg of global demand."

What Agassi didn't say is that we are at a time where demand is supercharged by policy around the world.

Israel wants to end its use of foreign oil by 2020. The Obama Administration wants 1 million plug-in cars on the road by 2015. The Danish government, one of Project Better Place's early partners, has brought in IBM, Siemens, and national energy company DONG to make 10% of Danish cars plug-ins within the next decade.

Bringing car-sharing and EV infrastructure together means cars with higher emissions will increasingly be taken off the road, increasing the proportion of electric vehicles as international research projects and corporate EV fleets advance.

We're bullish on Project Better Place, but until we can buy stock in that one, we'll keep an eye out for more companies like Teva that will benefit from growing EV fleets and Better Place's ever-growing resources and research.

There are also other companies around the world making high-efficiency vehicle batteries. Though they may be seen as competitors to Better Place once it goes public, a rising tide lifts all ships.

Green Chip International subscribers are already riding the wave.

A Stock Market Rebound?

Gird up your loins, dear reader. Put wax in your ears and lash yourself to the mast. You are about to be tempted.

"Lead us not into temptation," says the famous prayer. The old timers knew we were weak. They knew we couldn't resist. They didn't pray that we would "just say no" to temptation. They knew that wouldn't happen. Instead, they prayed to God to keep temptation away from us.

There's nothing like a little temptation to get the juices flowing. A roulette wheel that seems to stop just where you thought it would...a pretty woman who smiles at you on the cross-town bus...a pastry as big as a sombrero and as rich as El Dorado - oh...Heaven forefend!

But the hardest temptation to resist is the temptation of getting something for nothing.

"Investors begin dipping toes back into stocks," reports a Reuter's article.

"While economies keep contracting, stocks may have already started pricing in the end of recession and the beginning of a recovery."

Last week, the stock market showed a little leg. Yes, prices rose 12% over a 4-day period - teasing us with the prospect of a little fun. Finally - a rebound. Maybe.
The Dow rose again on Friday - up 53 points. The index is still down more than 15% for the year...and down more than 50% from its all time high. It is rare to see such big losses without a major rebound. Our guess is that we're finally ready for one.

On that basis, we have taken down our "Crash Alert" flag. If we're right, we're going to see stocks go up 20% to 50%. And we're going to hear more people talking about the end of the recession...and a new bull stock market.

GM said it really didn't need an extra $2 billion last week. Two of America's biggest banks said they were running in the black again. Even the retail sales figures were not as bad as people expected.

Houses in some communities - such as Riverside, California and Miami, Florida - are selling for only about half of what they brought three years ago. Surely this is the bottom of the housing slump, right? And sales of existing houses - at bargain prices - rose almost 50% in January, from a year before.

Our advice is to listen politely - but don't take it too seriously. This is a depression. If it follows the form of previous depressions, it will seem for a while that it is not a depression at all...but a recession, and one that is ending.

Many - probably most - people still believe that the crisis is merely a pause in an otherwise healthy economic model. They wait for the bailouts to take effect...and for the U.S. consumer to begin buying again. That is the fondest hope, by the way, of the Chinese government. The Chinese hold $1.4 trillion worth of U.S. dollar assets. They're worried that their stash of cash may lose value. But, so far, it is the only thing that is NOT losing value.

The poor Chinese began spreading their cash around just before Humpty Dumpty fell off the wall. A number of their high-profile deals went bad:

"China loses billions on equities bets ahead of markets' collapse," says an awkward headline in the Financial Times. By the end of June '08, the Chinese held more than $100 billion worth of U.S. equities. Bad timing. But the collapse of the U.S. stock market makes Beijing's other dollar holdings look good. The dollar has gone up. So, the lesson the Chinese have learned is this: the safest thing you can do is to continue lending to your biggest deadbeat customer.

It is a dangerous strategy. But the Chinese think that if they extend enough credit to the U.S. consumer, he'll come back in the shop. And Ben Bernanke, another dreamer, said last week that the recession could end this year.

Stocks will probably rise for a few months. The economic news will be better. The Dow could rise to above 10,000. Then, we will be tempted to think that all the king's horses and all the king's men are actually better at putting things back together than their reputation suggests. We'll be tempted to think that those bailouts and giveaways actually did the job...and that now, rather than turn our backs on temptation...we can safely give in to it.

Be careful, dear reader. Be careful. And keep in mind...no matter how tempting stocks may be looking in the near future, you can make major gains - without having to touch a single stock!

All it takes is 5 minutes a day, and you could be raking in triple- digit gains. And judging from this service's track record - no losing picks in over two years - triple-digit gains isn't much of a stretch. See for yourself here.

More news from today's issue of Agora Financial's 5 Min. Forecast...

"The flailing consumer economy in the United States has caused a nasty decline in the amount of money foreign workers ship back to their families at home," writes Addison Wiggin. Just take a look at this chart:

phpL3VPmU

"Still," he writes, "according to the World Bank, 'remittances', as those payments are called, exceeded $300 billion in 2008. That money 'accounts for 45% of GDP in Tajikistan, 38% in Moldova and 24% in Lebanon and Guyana,' says the Economist.

Addison writes every day for The 5 Min Forecast, an executive series e- letter that provides a quick and dirty analysis of daily economic and financial developments-in five minutes or less. It's a free service available only to subscribers of Agora Financial's paid publications, such as the Hulbert #1 Performing Investment Letter, Outstanding Investments.

*** The sentiment-du-jour is outrage. AIG has gotten about $160 billion in bailouts from the feds. Much of this money has been paid out to various counterparties. We're not supposed to know who the counterparties are, but the word on the street is that billions have gone to Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and two French banks, including Societe Generale. Why the taxpayer should be protecting Wall Street and foreign banks from their own errors is a subject for another day...

And now word has gotten to the press that AIG will pay out $165 million in bonuses. Top executives, for example, will get $6.5 million each. The company president defended the bonuses on two grounds.

First, he said, the execs were entitled to their bonuses by contracts made before the feds put in any money. The company couldn't unilaterally break its contracts.

Second, the firm needed to maintain the quality of its management. Especially, now that it is owned by the government, it needs good people to make sure the taxpayers get a good return on their stock investments.

The first argument seems to us watertight. He should have stopped there. The second leaks like a Baltimore water main. The easy retort is that given the quality of the top fellows at AIG bad management would be an improvement. But here at The Daily Reckoning we always forgo the cheap shots. Instead, we'll take a shot from the foul line:

What makes people think that they get better management by paying more money?

In the world at large, the difference in salary levels is shocking. At the top in Japan, the average executive earns only 3 times as much as the average salaryman. In Britain, top executives earn more than 10 times as much as their Japanese counterparts - or 39 times the average guy on the shop floor. And in America, the poor working stiff supports an executive who earns more than 300 times more than he does.

Is the American worth 10 times as much as his British confrere? Is he worth 100 times his Japanese competition? Is his business run better than either of theirs?

Don't make us laugh, dear reader. The only reason American executives earn so much is that they've conned the lumpeninvestoriat into believing that if they are paid more they will produce more. In fact, they're rarely the person actually responsible for output or innovation...and there is no evidence that we've ever seen to suggest that they do better at their jobs when they are paid more.

*** We spent the weekend working with the gardener again. We were joined by a neighbor, Paul, a round fellow, 75 years old - cutting firewood, splitting it, hauling it, stacking it.

Both Damien and Paul worked with cigarettes in their mouths. And both worked hard. Damien rarely says anything. But Paul never stopped talking.

"He's trying to kill us both," he said, pointing at Damien.

"Damien really knows how to work. He's been working hard all his life. Well, just try to find someone like Damien today. Young people don't want to work at all. And if they get a job, they expect a machine to do all the hard work. They don't know what a shovel is. You'd have a hard time getting a young person out to help us do this work...

"Everything has changed so much since I was young. You know, I was here in Normandy when the Americans landed. I remember seeing them go by. I was only 10 years old. But it made quite an impression on me. They had so many machines...tanks...trucks...jeeps. I had never seen so many vehicles.

"When I was ready to go to work, I went to work as a gardener. We worked by hand... We didn't have mechanical cultivators or garden tractors. We turned the ground with a spade. It was hard work...but I liked it.

"Then, I got into an argument with the boss. It was over nothing really. He told me to put up some cold frames...you know, for starting out the plants in the early spring. So they won't freeze. Then, he went off. He was a rascal. He didn't really do anything. He'd just tell us what to do and leave. And then he'd come back drunk later in the day and yell at us.

"So I put up the cold frames. And he came back and yelled at me:

"'What do you think you're doing... Don't you know how to put up cold frames correctly... My old crew could do this right. They were great workers. How come you don't know how to set up a cold frame?' He went on and on. So I just took of my apron and threw it at him.

"'Here...' I said, 'then let your old buzzards to it.' And I started to walk off. And he tried to stop me. What was I doing...who did I think I was, he said. Then, he even offered me more money to stay - another 50 centimes per hour.

"You laugh. But that was real money back then. And then, we got paid by the hour. We worked by the hour...as many hours as we wanted... and that was all there was to it.

"And I'll tell you something else. It wasn't like today. If you're starting out today, you have a hard time getting a job. You have to go to the right school and then get a trial period...and have the right training and get into the right program. And then, they interview you for days. Everybody is afraid to hire anyone because it so hard to fire them.

"It wasn't like that when I was starting out. You could just walk onto almost any jobsite and ask. If they needed help, you could start working the same day. I did a lot of things - I drove a truck, ran a café, worked for a food delivery service. If I didn't like the boss, I just quit. I always worked hard. Some bosses like that. Some don't. And I never minded saying what was on my mind. So when I saw something that didn't add up, I said so. And sometimes, I lost my job because of it. But it didn't matter, because there were plenty of jobs for someone who was willing to work.

"It's not like that now... That guy, what's his name, George...you know, the one who comes to help over here from time to time. He's on 'permanent disability' because he hurt his back. He can still walk. He can still talk. But he's considered permanently disabled because he was a mason...and now he can't carry heavy bags of cement. It's ridiculous. He could just go do something else. He's only about 40 years old. Instead, he does nothing - and we taxpayers support him.

"You know, they say that this financial crisis is going to be the end of capitalism. I don't think so. I think it's going to be the end of socialism...this kind of socialism we've had in France for the past 20 years. We can't afford it. There are too many people not working. Too many rules. Too much interference. A third of the country works. Another third tries to stop them from working. And the final third does nothing at all.

"I think the financial crisis is going to put an end to it... we can't afford it anymore."

Building a Better Bailout Plan

Nick Atkeson and Andrew Houghton of ChangeWave Options Trader have their own six-point plan to rescue the financial system and rebuild a 21st century economy.

We all want the economy to recover, as evidenced by the number of recovery plans we are seeing.

So far, all of the plans have two features in common.

First, they are all motivated by fear. "If we do not act," the plan sponsors plead, "we will all suffer dire consequences." But we have yet to see any serious attempt to analyze and quantify these "dire consequences."

Second, the plans assume we must fix the institutions that got us into this mess to stabilize our economy.

Common sense dictates that plans motivated by fear are generally not good ones. Since Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) and Citigroup (NYSE: C) received multibillion-dollar initial cash infusions from the federal government in October 2008, the stock values of both companies have declined by more than 70%. Many analysts firmly believe the equity value of these two banks is zero.

Watching the US government withdraw money for the next great plan from the giant "taxpayer ATM" in the Treasury is akin to watching Ruth Madoff withdraw $15 million from phantom investor accounts. At some point, we all say, "Enough already."

If we are going to mortgage our children's' futures, why don't we invest in their futures rather than our past?

Forget saving the failed institutions that sank our economy. Let's move on with new and better institutions.

Let's take our taxpayer dollars and focus it on parts of the economy that will pay dividends for years to come.

We recommend spending our bailout dollars on the following endeavors:

1. Make the United States the world leader in new energy technology and supply. Leading the world in reduced oil dependency will make us more secure, wealthy, and healthy.

2. Revamp our health care delivery system so all Americans have basic health care, while the cost of delivering care is substantially reduced. Energy and health care represent more than 20% of our national expenditures. They also represent huge areas for new growth and innovation that will immediately impact all of us.

3. Rebuild our public education system. Better educated, more competitive young workers will once again be a differentiating force for the US in the world marketplace.

4. Rebuild the electrical grid, not the highway system. In 1950, Americans needed highways to travel and generate commerce. In the 21st century, we travel electronically. Invest in the future of commercial infrastructure, not the past.

5. Terminate the Credit Default Swap (CDS) market. This action will de-leverage our economic system by trillions of dollars without costing a single penny of taxpayer money.

6. Allow the free markets to write off bad assets and default on excessive debt. In a relatively short time, the sins of overleverage will be washed away and new institutions will emerge to lead us forward. It should also do a fairly comprehensive job of removing those decision-makers who led us down the debt debauchery path.

 

Sticking With Two Buffett Banks

Jack Adamo, editor of Jack Adamo's Insiders Plus, says two big banks in which Warren Buffett has invested should outperform their peers by a wide margin over time.

Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and US Bancorp (NYSE: USB) are undoubtedly the two most solid of the large US banks.

We bought both Wells and USB based on the long-term support of Warren Buffett, who owns tons of each, and has said repeatedly that the companies are managed by the best chief executive officers in the business. You can be sure that Buffett is very clear about their financial condition and any problems they face.

Given the performance of the two stocks recently, one may be tempted to ask if The Wiz has lost his touch. Just as Buffett has said it has never paid to bet against America, it has never paid to bet against Buffett. His mistakes have been few and far between. Furthermore, the financial sector is his area of highest expertise.

In the late 1990s, many an editor, trying to make a name for himself, questioned Buffett's wisdom and relevance in what they saw as the New Economy. He didn't "get it," they said. He didn't understand technology, which is "where the money is."

Yet somehow, through it all, the staid Dow Jones Utility Average soundly outperformed the Nasdaq Composite index and the Nasdaq 100 over their entire lives, and particularly so in the new millennium.

Moreover, although he doesn't understand high tech, The Wiz understands balance sheets and cash flows. He made some incredible deals in distressed bonds in the tech sector during the tech crash. He garnered high coupon payments and high capital gains when he eventually sold or redeemed them.

So, I would not be too quick to assume again that Buffett has lost touch. Undoubtedly he got in too early on deals like Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and General Electric (NYSE: GE), but remember, he's getting 10% preferred dividends during a period when the market will be lucky to deliver a positive return at all.

The Oracle of Omaha has a longer time horizon than the average investor. He has said more than once that he wouldn't care if they closed the stock exchange for five years at a time. [So,] we shouldn't be surprised if these investments take longer to pan out than we'd like, but I'd be very surprised if they don't outperform the market substantially over the next few years, even from our original buy prices.

I like USB better than Wells because it looks to me like USB is recognizing its losses in a more timely manner. Big players in the market appear to agree with me: USB is seeing strong buying on these price drops, whereas Wells is not. (Wells and USB closed below $10 Friday―Editor.)

I will be disappointed if there's a dividend cut at either company, but I'm not worried about the safety of our money or the merit of the investment over a three- to five-year period. In this market, those are comforting thoughts.

 

How to Spot The Stock Market Bottom

Typically, a market can only bottom two ways. The first is a double bottom pattern. There are a few variations to this pattern:
1. A double bottom with a shake out low.
2. A First Thrust Up

In order to give you a clue as to what these look like and what to be on the lookout for, below are a few examples in multiple time frames and frequencies. First up are the market lows of last week in a four-to-six day, one-minute time frequency.

The chart above is super historical! It's the Great Depression lows. As you can see, the crash of 1929 was not the problem. It was the ensuing bear market that followed ― that was where the real wealth destruction took place. Sound familiar? What you'll really notice was that the market did not truly bottom until it formed a 1ST Thrust Up, then an eight-month Pullback Off Highs (POH)! Now let's fast forward to the bear market of 2000…

The chart above is also historical. It's a bear market we've all lived through ― the Tech Bubble Bear Market of 2000- 2003. Look familiar? Again, you did not get your true lows until you got the First Thrust Up, then the Pullback Off Highs (POH). As you can see, this particular POH lasted four months. (Note: The crash of 1987 also showed this pattern.)

Now that you've seen a few key historical market bottoms and what the technicals look like, you'll never have to listen to the talking heads on TV telling you what they think.

With this said, a retest of the lows by the market in the coming week will set up a boatload of issues on the longside and our final lows of the first leg down of this monster bear market. Then we get a reprieve of a decent time duration and a bear market rally.